Lock down your data access.

Row level security decides which authenticated or anonymous requests may read and change each row. A table can exist and still return permission errors if grants and policies do not match the request.

Lovable + Supabase · 8 min read · Updated 2026-06-06

Think in operations

A few moving parts are involved here. The points below cover each of them, so you can see the full scope before deciding where to start.

  • SELECT: which rows may this role read?
  • INSERT: which values may this role create, and who owns them?
  • UPDATE: which existing rows may change, and what new values are allowed?
  • DELETE: which rows may be removed?
  • Functions: which trusted server-side operations may execute?

A secure ownership pattern

Store the owner ID on the row and compare it with the authenticated user ID inside the policy. For privileged roles, use a server-side role lookup function rather than a client flag or local storage value.

create policy "Users read their own rows"
on public.items
for select
to authenticated
using (owner_id = auth.uid());
  1. Confirm the request is using the intended auth session.
  2. Check table grants for the calling role.
  3. Read the exact policy expression and test the owner and non-owner cases.
  4. Check insert validation separately from select visibility.
  5. Inspect function execution permissions and search path for database functions.
Never solve a permission error by making a policy always true. That removes the boundary instead of explaining the missing access.

Test the negative path

A secure policy is proven when the wrong user cannot read, edit or delete another user's record. Include those cases in QA before adding a wider role.

Warning signs of a weak policy

This comes down to a handful of concrete details. Work through the list below and flag the ones you have not covered yet.

  • A policy references a column the client can set on insert, such as a role or owner_id field with no server-side check.
  • A policy passes because it was tested only with the owner account.
  • A function used inside a policy runs with elevated privileges and no search path set.
  • The same policy expression handles both read and write with no distinction between them.
  • A table has RLS enabled but no policies, which silently blocks every request instead of failing loudly during testing.

Diagnostic sequence for a permission error

Here is the process broken into clear steps. Take them one at a time and check each off before continuing.

  1. Reproduce the exact request with the same user session, not an admin session.
  2. Read the returned error code and message rather than guessing.
  3. List every policy on the table for the operation involved.
  4. Evaluate the policy expression manually against the row and the user ID.
  5. Check whether a trigger or function called during the request has its own separate permission requirement.

Questions

Row level security is enabled but no policy grants select access to the calling role. This fails silently rather than with an obvious error, so check for an existing select policy before assuming the query itself is wrong.

No. A client-side check only hides a button or route; it does not stop a direct request to the database. The policy is the actual security boundary and must hold even if the UI is bypassed entirely.

Usually not. Select policies decide what a user can see, while insert policies decide what values a user may create and whose ownership they may claim. Reusing one expression for both often lets a user insert a row they should not be able to own.

Want your app built properly?

We take Lovable prototypes to production: secure data, real auth and a clean deploy.